Week 2 Research Checkpoint [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, and 4] [CLOs: 2, 3, 4, and 5] As was laid out in the Week 1 and Week 2 lessons and the Week 1 Discussion,

 

Week 2 Research Checkpoint

[WLOs: 1, 2, 3, and 4] [CLOs: 2, 3, 4, and 5]

As was laid out in the Week 1 and Week 2 lessons and the Week 1 Discussion, you will be working on your final assignment throughout the course. In Weeks 2 and 4, you will keep your instructor apprised of your progress by providing an update of your headway thus far. 

Prior to working on this assignment, you will need to identify at least one source on your social problem from one of the two disciplines you selected last week. To do so, choose a discipline you want to explore. Access the journal links through your online course. Once you have selected a discipline, start your research for your final by identifying one source that aligns with your final topic, read it, and reflect upon it. The blue headings below contain links to resources for specific disciplines.

Select the blue headings to expand the text in each section.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Assessment Record Student Name

Assessment Record Student Name Course Course Code Class/Group Unit of Competency /Cluster RTO/SRTO Assessment: (as applicable) Student Results: 1. Satisfactory |_| Not Yet Satisfactory |_| Not Completed |_| 2. Satisfactory |_| Not Yet Satisfactory |_| Not Completed |_| 3. Satisfactory |_| Not Yet Satisfactory |_| Not Completed |_| Overall, the

  topic:   How do intelligence-sharing mechanisms contribute to enhancing homeland security preparedness and response?   Please share with your

  topic:   How do intelligence-sharing mechanisms contribute to enhancing homeland security preparedness and response?   Please share with your classmates the significant findings of your  research. How do your findings contribute to the discipline of homeland  security? Please provide at least three (3) sources that significantly  contributed to your findings. Please include

Chart SPD-485 Literacy Case Studies Key for Percentiles Low: Student scores lower than

Chart SPD-485 Literacy Case Studies Key for Percentiles Low: Student scores lower than the 21st percentile. Low to Average: Student scores in the 21st-40th percentile. Average: Student scores in the 41st-60th percentile. Average-High: Student scores in the 61st-80th percentile. High: Student scores in the 81st and above percentile. Elementary School