Module 4, Week 6 | Quantitative Research Critical Appraisal 2 Assignment Name __________________________________ Step 1: Read

Module 4, Week 6 | Quantitative Research Critical Appraisal 2 Assignment

Name __________________________________

Step 1: Read the
abstract and the
methods sections of:

· Swenson, S., et al. (2016) Parents’ use of praise and criticism in a sample of young children seeking mental health services.
Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 30, 49-56.

· Wilson, R. et al. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of an individualized preoperative education intervention for symptom management after total knee arthroplasty.
Orthopaedic Nursing, 35(1)

Step 2: Read Chapters 8, 9, 13, and 14 of your textbook.

Step 3: Complete the table below and upload it through the assignment tab. Please be sure to view and understand the associated rubric for this assignment. Include rationales for each of your answers to demonstrate concept mastery.

Questions

Swenson et al.

Wilson et al.

Research Design

Was the design experimental, quasi-experimental, or nonexperimental? What was the specific design used?

If there was an intervention, were the intervention and the control conditions adequately described?

If the study was nonexperimental, why did the researcher opt not to intervene?

What are the major limitations of the design used?

Sampling Plan

Was the population identified? Were eligibility criteria specified?

What type of sampling plan was used?

How many participants were in the sample? What was the attrition rate?

Were key characteristics of the sample described?

Data Collection

Did the report provide adequate information about data collection procedures?

Did the report offer reliability measures for the instruments used? Was reliability acceptable?

Did the report offer validity of the instrument?

If there was no reliability or validity information, what conclusion can you draw about the study?

Appraising Statistical Analysis

Did the descriptive statistics sufficiently describe the major variables and background characteristics of the sample?

Did the researchers report inferential statistics? What were they?

Were any multivariate procedures used? What were they?

What were the significant results? How does this support or not support the hypothesis?

Based on both appraisals, which report do you find more valuable? Provide rationale.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Please read thoroughly as price is not negotiable Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to utilize information acquired through the NR327

Please read thoroughly as price is not negotiable Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to utilize information acquired through the NR327 course to provide appropriate discharge education to clients regarding pregnancy, preconception, antenatal, perinatal, intrapartum, or postpartum health. The student(s) should consider the target audience health literacy, cultural needs,

i-Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Genitourinary or Gastrointestinal Conditions Urinary frequency is an example of a genitourinary

i-Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Genitourinary or Gastrointestinal Conditions Urinary frequency is an example of a genitourinary condition that presents problems for adults across the lifespan. It can be the result of various systemic conditions such as diabetes, urinary tract infections, enlarged prostates, kidney infections, or prostate cancer. Many

Civility in the workplace is essential to promote a healthy workplace environment for employees along with those they serve. According to the

Civility in the workplace is essential to promote a healthy workplace environment for employees along with those they serve. According to the American Association of Critical care. Nurses, there are six standards for establishing a healthy work environment, including skilled communication, effective decision making, appropriate staffing levels, effective collaboration, authentic