Module 2 Discussion: Self-Reporting Leadership Assessment Instructions  · Choose 1 of 3 Self-Reporting

Module 2 Discussion: Self-Reporting Leadership Assessment

Instructions 

· Choose 1 of 3 Self-Reporting Leadership Assessments (e.g., Ethical Leadership, Authentic Leadership, General Leadership) that are provided in the Module 2: Self-Reporting Instrument Folder.

· Complete the Assessment.

· Use the results or insights obtained from your assessment activity to respond to the Module 2 Discussion questions (see below).

· Respond to classmates posts, per the discussion post timeline.

· In your responses to classmates’ posts,
 indicate whether or not you have experienced similar circumstances described in 
their post and how it was addressed
.

· Use APA style headers to organize your discussion into three sections as described below.

1.

1.

1.
Situation

2.
Self-Reporting Instrument (e.g., identify the one you selected) and Personal Attributes 
(e.g., Authentic Leadership Instrument and Personal Attributes

).

3.
Influential PCL Characteristics

Module 2 Discussion Prompt and Questions

1.
Situation: Describe a situation or circumstance in which you drew upon a strength and/or personal attribute that you identified in your Self-Reporting Assessment to influence others to achieve a desired outcome; and indicate the desired outcome you aimed to achieve.

2.
Name of Self-Reporting Instrument and Personal Attributes: When considering the strengths you drew upon to influence others to achieve this desired outcome, which leadership style(s) were appropriately suited for the conditions you described.

3.  
Influential PCL Characteristics: Identify which of the eight PCL characteristics (Covey, 1991) played a role in manifesting influence towards achieving the desired outcome described.


Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Assessment Record Student Name

Assessment Record Student Name Course Course Code Class/Group Unit of Competency /Cluster RTO/SRTO Assessment: (as applicable) Student Results: 1. Satisfactory |_| Not Yet Satisfactory |_| Not Completed |_| 2. Satisfactory |_| Not Yet Satisfactory |_| Not Completed |_| 3. Satisfactory |_| Not Yet Satisfactory |_| Not Completed |_| Overall, the

  topic:   How do intelligence-sharing mechanisms contribute to enhancing homeland security preparedness and response?   Please share with your

  topic:   How do intelligence-sharing mechanisms contribute to enhancing homeland security preparedness and response?   Please share with your classmates the significant findings of your  research. How do your findings contribute to the discipline of homeland  security? Please provide at least three (3) sources that significantly  contributed to your findings. Please include

Chart SPD-485 Literacy Case Studies Key for Percentiles Low: Student scores lower than

Chart SPD-485 Literacy Case Studies Key for Percentiles Low: Student scores lower than the 21st percentile. Low to Average: Student scores in the 21st-40th percentile. Average: Student scores in the 41st-60th percentile. Average-High: Student scores in the 61st-80th percentile. High: Student scores in the 81st and above percentile. Elementary School