In the previous assignment, you developed a position paper for the research topic that you have identified and explored. You have recommendations for

In the previous assignment, you developed a position paper for the research topic that you have identified and explored. You have recommendations for change, revocation, modification, and addition to the research topic. Your research topic has come from an issue, problem, or policy of law enforcement, corrections, or the court system. In this assignment, you will revise your IP 4 draft based on instructor and peer feedback and you will evaluate an alternative position to your  topic selected that was not addressed in your original IP4 draft. 

-First, revise your unit 4 IP bases on instructor feedback and peer responses. 

-Next, add to your final IP4 draft by addressing the following in 4-5 pages: 

Select 1 alternative to your position addresses in the Unit IP4 regarding your selected topic: 

What major points  are argues by proponents of this alternative position? Explain in detail. 

Conduct research on this alternative position and evaluate the arguments. 

-Do the arguments hold any merit? Why/why not? 

– What policies currently exist that support these arguments? Explain in detail. 

-Which position is more significant for improving the current state of the criminal justice system? Explain in detail. 

Remember to use academic and scholarly sources to support your arguments. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Revise your Key Assignment from Week 4 by incorporating the instructor’s and peers’ feedback that you have received. Address the following in a policy

Revise your Key Assignment from Week 4 by incorporating the instructor’s and peers’ feedback that you have received. Address the following in a policy proposal: Another approach to the legislature’s interest in creating alternative approaches to dealing with juvenile offenders that would still be handled via the state court’s system might