Due 9/21/2024 Submit the written memo, which should be 3 pages in length. This assignment requires students to demonstrate in-depth analyses for the

Due 9/21/2024

Submit the written memo, which should be 3 pages in length.

This assignment requires students to demonstrate in-depth analyses for their self-selected case (Half of Loaf) with a memo format.

To address each case, the recommended structure and expected responses are listed as below:

·
Basic information (headings). At the beginning of each memo, students must indicate (1) the recipient, (2) the student’s role, and (3) the memo’s subject.

·
Abstract. An abstract should be the first component of each memo which summarizes the self-selected case, including its background, controversies, analyses, and recommendations

·
Introduction. Students must “briefly” introduce the context of selected case (i.e., background and outcome) and the relevance to the field of public administration.

·
Discussion. This section is the most important section of this memo. Students should clearly indicate those controversial or important issues involved in the selected case. For example, to analyze an initiative of work-from-home policy, students can respectively examine the potential pros and cons.

·
Recommendation. Based on the discussion section, students should provide concrete recommendations for the given case. In addition, these recommendations should also be based on our class readings.

·
References. Students must provide a list of references at the end of each memo, following the APA format to indicate the cited sources.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

SEE ATTACHED CASE STUDY 3: This is a turnitin.com assignment. Please cite 2 outside sources and the textbook author: Martocchio, J. J. (2020).

SEE ATTACHED CASE STUDY 3: This is a turnitin.com assignment. Please cite 2 outside sources and the textbook author: Martocchio, J. J. (2020). Strategic compensation: A human resource management approach (10th Ed.). Boston Pearson Education. *******Support your analysis with at least two RECENT scholarly sources to substantiate your insights****** *****The

Overview To be wrongfully terminated is to be fired for an illegal reason, which may involve a violation of federal antidiscrimination laws or a breach

Overview To be wrongfully terminated is to be fired for an illegal reason, which may involve a violation of federal antidiscrimination laws or a breach of contract. The legal standards governing termination differ substantially depending on whether private-sector and nonunion employees or public-sector and unionized employees are being considered. As

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

SEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

See Attached. TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

See Attached. TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of